Did anyone else see that article about the Belgian guy who had sex with his friend's dog? He said something like he did it out of love because the dog couldn't get laid otherwise. Anyone got a link for me?
Whoa, thanks! Scary stuff. I couldn't find it again anywhere, and my friend didn't believe me. I was starting to wonder, "Did I DREAM that? Please GOD don't let me have dreamed it!"
I can't help it if I read the news and there's dog-fucking in it! I don't LIKE dog-fucking!!! I don't even like most dogs! And I despise the people who would fuck them, for love or lust!
I don't get it. He wanted to "pleasure" the dogs? Is that right?
That would insinuate that all of the dogs were female and he was entering them vaginally, right? (Because, no dog, male or female, would like being vigorously plunged in it's bung.)
Now, I'm no vetrinarian... but, I've always been under the impression that only females from the primate species could have orgasms. In other words, no other female animal has the "eqipment" for such "pleasuring". **Not including humans, of course.** (And to be sure, an animal being in heat and an animal having an orgasm is not the same thing. I've seen both cats and dogs in heat and have seen them being mounted and whatever the female thought she wanted beforehand, it certainly wasn't what she wanted after she got it. Especially cats, that whole unbrella-wang thing is fucking bizzare!)
Is that right or wrong? And if it's right, why didn't ol' puppy-porker know that?
LOL--I dunno, man. I'm not going to get too far into the head of a guy who would hump a dog. :) And I'm pretty sure that any capacity for orgasm that the dogs might have would be nixed by the horror of being violated by another species. :)
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 08:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 08:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 08:38 pm (UTC)And, here he thought he was doing the dogs a favor.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 08:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 08:41 pm (UTC)I was gonna say something about protesting too much, but I'll let it go.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 08:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 08:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 08:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 09:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 09:10 pm (UTC)It makes me want to puke.
Rationalizing The Irrational
Date: 2005-03-22 10:18 pm (UTC)He wanted to "pleasure" the dogs?
Is that right?
That would insinuate that all of the dogs were female and he was entering them vaginally, right?
(Because, no dog, male or female, would like being vigorously plunged in it's bung.)
Now, I'm no vetrinarian... but, I've always been under the impression that only females from the primate species could have orgasms.
In other words, no other female animal has the "eqipment" for such "pleasuring".
**Not including humans, of course.**
(And to be sure, an animal being in heat and an animal having an orgasm is not the same thing.
I've seen both cats and dogs in heat and have seen them being mounted and whatever the female thought she wanted beforehand, it certainly wasn't what she wanted after she got it.
Especially cats, that whole unbrella-wang thing is fucking bizzare!)
Is that right or wrong?
And if it's right, why didn't ol' puppy-porker know that?
no subject
Date: 2005-03-22 11:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 08:50 am (UTC)Re: Rationalizing The Irrational
Date: 2005-03-23 02:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-23 05:18 pm (UTC)